Skip to main content

Message to New York Session of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine

Bertrand Russell died on 2 February 1970, in his 98th year. Two days earlier he had composed a message to the International Conference of Parliamentarians, who were about to meet in Cairo whilst Israeli air raids reached deep into Egyptian territory. Russell’s message was read to the assembled parliamentarians on the day after his sudden death. He had remarked that:


‘The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was “given” by a foreign Power to another people for the creation of a new State. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their numbers have increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty? It is abundantly clear that the refugees have every right to the homeland from which they were driven, and the denial of this right is at the heart of the continuing conflict. No people anywhere in the world would accept being expelled en masse from their own country; how can anyone require the people of Palestine to accept a punishment which nobody else would tolerate? A permanent just settlement of the refugees in their homelands is an essential ingredient of any just settlement in the Middle East.’

Russell spoke with characteristic passion and clarity. More than 40 years on, the tragedy and injustices done to the people of Palestine, which he described, persist and grow deeper. That is why, several years ago, when Pierre Galand and Robert Kissous travelled to England to propose a Russell Tribunal on Palestine to Ken Coates, then Chairman of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, Ken readily agreed to ‘lend our flag’ for the purpose. This was unfinished business, as far as the Russell Foundation was concerned.

All this was before the 60th anniversary of the expulsion of the Palestinian peoples, in 1948, which we have now come to know as the ‘Nakba’. At this meeting in Matlock in the English countryside, Pierre Galand remarked that almost 60 years had passed and the Palestinians still did not have a State. So it was that the Russell Tribunal on Palestine was born, with the moral support of the Russell Foundation. It was to grow into an impressive autonomous initiative which probes continuing and widespread complicity on the part of states, international bodies such as the European Union, and corporations in the enduring tragedy of the Palestinian people. Russell had asked ‘How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty?’ One answer is ‘all too long’.

So we welcome the Tribunal’s New York Session on ‘US complicity and UN failings in dealing with Israel’s violations of international law towards the Palestinian people’, and await its findings with keen anticipation. Previous sessions of the Tribunal, in Barcelona, London and Cape Town, have afforded new insights into a persisting dilemma. The London session, which I attended, highlighted the actions of many corporations which shore up the infrastructure of occupation and repression, represented so starkly by the long high wall now winding across Palestine. It also brought together activists in diverse campaigns in Israel, the United States and Europe which expose such complicity, together with lawyers who perceive pillage and plunder on the part of the occupiers and those who help them. Those of us who attended in London in November 2010 heard of some notable victories in respect of shifting the approach of corporations engaged in diverse sectors such as transport, finance, prisons and cosmetics.

Russell had, apparently, been rather sceptical when what became the Vietnam War Crimes Tribunal was first proposed, in the 1960s. You might think that a characteristic response on his part. He was exercised about aspects of victors’ justice which had characterised some of the proceedings of the Nuremberg Tribunal, but came to see that, in fact, something like the reverse obtained in the case of the Vietnam Tribunal. In November 1966 in London, in a speech to the first meeting of members of the War Crimes Tribunal, he said:

‘ …We do not represent any state power, nor can we compel the policy-makers responsible for crimes against the people of Vietnam to stand accused before us. We lack force majeure. The procedures of a trial are impossible to implement. I believe that these apparent limitations are, in fact, virtues. We are free to conduct a solemn and historic investigation, uncompelled by reasons of state or other such obligations.. ’

The Russell Tribunal on Palestine is similarly free to conduct its solemn and historic investigation. In 1966, Russell concluded by saying ‘May this Tribunal prevent the crime of silence’. We share his purpose.

In that sense, we would like to alert participants in New York to the continuing imprisonment of Ayse Berktay Hacimirzaoglu and thousands of other activists seeking a peaceful and democratic resolution of Kurdish demands in Turkey. Ayse is a keen supporter of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine, and has offered advice arising from her own experiences in helping to organise the World Tribunal on Iraq, which culminated in Istanbul in 2005. Her extensive travels to realise that project are now listed in the criminal indictment against her and hundreds of other Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) activists, currently on trial in Turkey. Her peaceful activism is used against her as though it were for some unspecified unlawful purpose. She and many others have been imprisoned for a year already in pre-trial detention. As you will see from the Russell Foundation website, we seek to prevent the crime of silence in their cases as well.

We look forward to a fruitful Session.

Tony Simpson Ken Fleet
Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation

http://www.russelltribunalonpalestine.com/en/

www.russfound.org

21 September 2012



The Russell Tribunal on Palestine (RToP) will be holding its fourth international session in New York City on Saturday, October 6 and Sunday, October 7. It will take place in Manhattan, venue TBA.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Keywords: Art, Culture and Society in 1980s Britain

Tate Liverpool: Exhibition 28 February – 11 May 2014 Adult £8.80 (without donation £8) Concession £6.60 (without donation £6) Help Tate by including the voluntary donation to enable Gift Aid Keywords: Art, Culture and Society in 1980s Britain , is a new take on how the changes in the meaning of words reflect the cultural shifts in our society. This dynamic exhibition takes its name and focus from the seminal 1976 Raymond Williams book on the vocabulary of culture and society. An academic and critic influenced by the New Left, Williams defined ‘Keywords’ as terms that repeatedly crop up in our discussion of culture and society. His book contains more than 130 short essays on words such as ‘violence’, ‘country’, ‘criticism’, ‘media’, ‘popular’ and ‘exploitation’ providing an account of the word’s current use, its origin and the range of meanings attached to it. Williams expressed the wish some other ‘form of presentation could be devised’ for his book, and this exhibition i...

'Not as dumb as he looks' - Muhammad Ali on Bertrand Russell

In his autobiography The Greatest: My Own Story , Muhammad Ali recounts how Bertrand Russell got in contact with him, and their ensuing correspondence: *** For days I was talking to people from a whole new world. People who were not even interested in sports, especially prizefighting. One in particular I will never forget: a remarkable man, seventy years older than me but with a fresh outlook which seemed fairer than that of any white man I had ever met in America. My brother Rahaman had handed me the phone, saying, ‘Operator says a Mr. Bertrand Russell is calling Mr. Muhammad Ali.’ I took it and heard the crisp accent of an Englishman: ‘Is this Muhammad Ali?’ When I said it was, he asked if I had been quoted correctly. I acknowledged that I had been, but wondered out loud, ‘Why does everyone want to know what I think about Viet Nam? I’m no politician, no leader. I’m just an athlete.’ ‘Well,’ he said, ‘this is a war more barbaric than others, and because a mystique is built up ...

James Kirkup

James Kirkup has died, aged 91. In 2004 he sent us a copy of No More Hiroshimas . He had originally collected together this volume of hia A-bomb poems in 1983, but it took twenty years before we published it 'as a real book'. James recounts 'My A-Bomb Biography' in his preface. Here are the opening lines of the title poem, No Mor e Hiroshimas . At the station exit, my bundle in hand, Early the winter afternoon's wet snow Falls thinly round me, out of a crudded sun. I had forgotten to remember where I was. Looking about, I see it might be anywhere - A station, a town like any other in Japan, Ramshackle, muddy, noisy, drab; a cheerfully Shallow impermanence: peeling concrete, litter, 'Atomic Lotion, for hair fall-out', a flimsy department store; Racks and towers of neon, flashy over tiled and tilted waves Of little roofs, shacks cascading lemons and persimmons, Oranges and dark-red apples, shanties awash with rainbows Of squid and octopus, shellfish, slabs o...